“When we are serious and want to  formally make a commitment to Krsna, then Diksa-gurus makes that  link. […]. If you take Diksa-guru as that person who makes the  contract with Krsna, then it is Prabhupada.”
This is what Srila Prabhupada teaches:
                “It is a basic principle that one  must accept a bona fide spiritual master in order to achieve the  highest perfection of life, love of God. I thank all of you very much for accepting me as  your spiritual master, and I promise that I will take you back to  home, back to Godhead.”
                  (Letter from Srila Prabhupada to  initiated disciple, November 12th, 1971)
This was the standard understanding  every Srila Prabhupada disciple had when they got initiated by Srila  Prabhupada, that he was the person taking them back to Krishna. Not that he was  an officiator at the ceremony. That role was played by, not  surprisingly, the officiators at the ceremony, such as the temple president and ritvik  representatives. HPS has now turned everything on its head, claiming  that a ritvik is the same as a diksa guru, just so he can justify himself  and all the other ISKCON gurus taking the position of diksa guru, and  having all their “disciples” worship them as such. Cheating par excellence - ‘We  are not diksa gurus, so let’s just change the definition of a diksa  guru, so that we can still usurp Srila Prabhupada’s position and take disciples for  ourselves.’
                The Great Guru Hoax has thus evolved  from the Great Guru Hoax, Part 1, where 11 zonal “successors” at  least pretended they were real diksa gurus, to the Great Guru Hoax, Part 3,  where the ISKCON “gurus” have now just thrown in the towel, and  admitted they are not diksa gurus at all, just ritviks, BUT who still want to  keep all the benefits of being a diksa guru by insisting they take  disciples who must continue to worship and accept them as if they were real diksa gurus.