|
Dayarama Tries to Get
Himself
Off The Hook Again
|
Thu, 26 Oct 2000

Dear Prabhus,
PAMHO AGTSP Dayarama is as usual putting the cart before the horse to
try and move the goal posts. First we had him trying to ask for
resignations before any investigation was done even though it was not
what Bhima had asked for.
Then we had him admit that no rape had took place but that it sex for
money
- even though the case is about rape through force - as stated in
Basanti's FIR. Now his latest trick is to try and speak about the
conspiracy issue when the investigation was about the legitimacy of the
FIR, and it was in relation to this that Bhima asked for resignations -
see below:
"Dear
Dayaram Prabhu One devotee who had taken shelter in our temple has
committed suicide.
You and Jayapataka Swami are saying he is guilty and Adri Dharan is
saying he is innocent. Not only that but Adri Dharan has been named in
the FIR (Official Allegation) as sending this lady who was allegedly
raped to the alleged rapist. Now what is your side of the story? We
must come to the bottom of this and the person who is lying in this
case should resign.
Jayapataka Swami has already given a statement that the devotee is
guilty so he should also state how he came to that conclusion."
(Bhima Das, 18/9/00, COM Message 3552288) |
If the FIR IS
true, then the issue of who cooked it up is automatically resolved -
since no one did. So the investigation was intended to settle the key
issue about the validity if the FIR - once this is done - everything
else will fall into place. It is understandable why Dayarama is trying
to avoid this issue for the SECOND time - since he has already conceded
that rape as described in the FIR did NOT take place. Please see below
our expose of his FIRST attempt at trying to sneakily get himself off
the hook:
| Dayarama
Concedes That FIR Untrue |
Dayarama is now
putting forward allegations that are CONTRARY to the FIR.
The allegation of the FIR is RAPE - not Sex. Basanti states
categorically that she was forcibly raped. From the very beginning
Dayarama has been trying to sneakily slip in the fact that it is NOT
rape, even though Basanti and JPS cleary state that there was forcible
rape. Please see the tricks Dayarama has played:
First on 21/9/00, Dayarama states this:
| "Rape
deesn't mean that Suresvar physically overpowered her but rather
Suresvar had sex with her against her will under the fear of stopping
her monthly money." |
Here Dayarama
presents a scenario that involes consensual sex for money, which is in
total contradiction to Basanti's FIR.
Now on 28/9/00, he goes further and states that the issue is simply if
Suresvara had sex:
| "that if it
is proven that Suresvar is not innocent gentleman, a Brahmachari, who
follwed no sex principle strictly then how will I be guaranteed that
Adri will resign." |
So we have gone
from Basanti stating that it was forcible 'bad shivering with body
pain' rape, and JPS saying that it was 'definitely rape', to Dayarama
stating first it was sex using money as a lever, to now that it was
simply sex. So even Dayarama is now accepting that she could be lying.
The fact that Dayarama has moved so much so quickly simply proves that
he knows that rape did not take place. If even he does not have
confidence in Basanti's FIR then why should anyone else? It appears the
investigation is practically over - Dayarama himself is willing to
concede there is no rape.
If Dayarama agrees that the FIR is 100% correct, then why is he EVEN
raising all these issues which are CONTRARY to the FIR? Why would a man
who has
100% confidence in the FIR, keep putting forward the possibilty that
the FIR is not true? Whose side is Dayarama on? I thought he was
representing the FIR.
If he is then why doesn't he stick to stating that the FIR is 100% true?
Instead he simply keeps putting forward propositions that are CONTRARY
to the FIR. Is this the action of a man who believes the FIR is true?
If the FIR is NOT true - then the investigation is finished.
I have already given so much evidence showing why the FIR is untrue,
and Dayarama himself is simply also putting forward propositions that
are contrary to the FIR. So WHERE is the evidence in SUPPORT of the FIR.
Dayarama is definitely not producing it, since he does not even appear
to agree with the FIR, and this would also explain his reluctance to
come forward with any evidence. And JPS who said it was definitely rape
is not producing the evidence supporting the FIR either.
So. It is clear that the FIR IS a lie, that Basanti was lying, that JPS
was lying, and Dayarama himself is now agreeing that this could
definitely be the case.
So unless Bhima is able to find someone else who wants to represent the
FIR, the matter is settled - the FIR is untrue - which is the very
matter under investigation.
He also knows now that the investigation has revealed that the FIR has
more holes in it then swiss cheese. Thus knowing that the FIR was
false, knowing that no rape took place, he is now trying to shift the
issue and salavage something by focusing on the issue of who was
involved. Well once the FIR has been declared invalid, then naturally
we assume that Bhima will call for a second investigation to determine
who was behind cooking up a case that led to the death of an innocent
devotte. But first this investigation must decide the validity of the
FIR, which is what it was intended to do - as shown by his original
message reproduced above. Even Dayarama has titled his message RAPE
investigation - so even he knows what it is about. That's right
- THIS investigation is about investigating the rape as given in the
FIR.
Once the validity of this is determined then naturally we will need to
look into who was behind it.
ys, adri
---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Text COM:3660535 (36 lines)
From: Dayaram (das) JPS (Mayapur - IN)
Date: 26-Oct-00 02:53 To: Bhima (das) ACBSP (TP Mumbai, Juhu - IN)
[6601] To: ICC (Indian Continental Committee) [2967] Subject: Rape
investigation
Dear Bhima
Prabhu Dandavats. All glories to Srila Prabhupada.
More than 3 weks have passed since Pancharatna Prabhu and Bhaktarupa
Prabhu made the investigation and sent the material to Mumbai. I had
offered to resign in advance and expected Adri to do the same but he
refused.
NOnetheless the terms were clear that whoever has lied should resign.
I wonder what is the result of the investigation. On many issues it may
be his word against Basanti's (the victim lady) etc. and you may need
to examin other witnessess and evidences.
But I am really wondering what substance have you found in Adri's
accusation that we (I and other Mayapur Devotees) conspired to file
false charges. Has Adri given any details of this conspiracy. Please
note that this accusation was levelled in the media, on the next day,
after the rape incident by ADri and also later on many times.
What substance has been provided for that by ADri or anyone else?
Conspiracy means making a plan before the incident took place. That
means we must have met with lady in some place at some time and some
way convinced or forced her to do what she did.
Has Adri given any details of such meeting- Date, time, place etc.
If not then this proves that he is lying on this count at least and he
should resign as promised by himself and discussed on this conference.
I would like you to respond to this immediately. I expect that in case
Adri has provided the details of such a conspiracy then kindly verify
the same and if proven that I did conspire then my resignation letter
will be given.
Hare Krsna.
Your servant, Dayaram Das
--------------------------------------------
(Text
COM:3660535) Fri, 27 Oct 2000
Dear Prabhus,
PAMHO AGTSP Dayarama is really getting desparate.
-
It is
interesting to note that he has offered no defence in support of the
very issue that the investigation was set up to determine - the
validity of the FIR - which as I showed in my last note Dayarama has
already conceded.
-
If the FIR
is false then Dayarama would have to resign immediately.
-
A conspiracy
does NOT require the meeting of the accused BEFORE the act.
This is such an
elementary legal point. Anyone with even a cursory understanding of the
law knows that there are 3 separate acts of conspiracy.
They are known as:
Conspiracy before, during and after the fact.
-
I have not
specified how many of these conspiracies were involved.
Nor have I accused anyone SPECIFICALLY - I have therefore used GENERIC
terms - "JPS Camp", "Mayapur Devotees". These are broad terms and refer
to those who are involved in the fight against the IRM in West Bengal.
-
Now for
anyone who has a least a basic grasp of the English language this means
that my position is:
a) A rape as alleged in the FIR did not place.
b) This means the FIR was false.
c) Basanti had assistance in filing a knowingly false case.
d) This assistance came from members of a group opposed to the IRM
referred to as the 'JPS Camp' or 'Mayapur devotees'.
Points a-d to
have already been substantiated. (Basanti was in contact with
various people for the 10 hours before she filed the case).
Dayarama can duck and dive as much as he wants. But the FIR has been
proven false.
Thus Dayarama should resign IMMEDIATELY. Even he is trying to concede
without anyone noticing that Basanti was not raped 'horribly' through
the use of force so that she was 'shivering with body pain'.
Dayarama has avoided this point 3 times. I will ask him for the 4th
time - do you or do you not agree that:
"Basanti was raped 'horribly' for 2 hours through the use of
force so that her body was 'shivering in pain' - as alleged in the
FIR".
Now for once be honest and answer YES or NO.
Please - YES or NO.
Everyone is watching. Let us see if you can give a straight-forward
answer.
Remember YES or NO.
And I will ask this question every hour until you answer - so there is
no point avoiding it.
ys, adri
----- Original Message ----- From: "Adri Dharan (das) ACBSP (Calcutta)"
<Adri.Dharan.ACBSP@pamho.net> To: "adridharana"
<radha3c@giascl01.vsnl.net.in> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000
4:13 PM Subject: Rape investigation
---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Text COM:3664319 (49 lines)
From: Dayaram (das) JPS (Mayapur - IN)
Date: 27-Oct-00 09:38 To: ICC (Indian Continental Committee) [2969]
Reference: Text COM:3661677 by Adri Dharan (das) ACBSP (Calcutta)
Subject: Rape investigation
------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Prabhu's
Again Adri's spin masters at work, Getting into irrelevant things.
The investiagation was about lying. Who is lyiing Dayarama or Adri.
Bhima has made it clear right in the begining. I was not only asking
for Adri's resignation but first offering mine to make sure that Bhima
as judge can enforce his decision without any litigation etc. Adri
refused it showing that he has no faith in Bhima as a judge.
I have stated the following points many times as our respective stands
many times.
Adri's stand
1. Mayapur devotees(Dayarama and oths) conspire to file false case
against Suresvar.
2. Sureshvar is innoscent gentleman.
3. Adri on that day or never before sent Basanti to Sureshvar.
4. Suresvar was murdered in the jail as per sattvik's petition and in
some other forum Sureshvar, a Brhamchari and an innoscent gentlemann
couldn't take the humiliation of the false charges and commited suicide.
Our Stand.
1. mayapur devotees (dayarama and oths) mever made any conspiracy and
found out about it only after the rape took place.
2. Suresvar is guilty.
3. Adri sent Basanti to Suresvar not only on that day but before also.
4. We don't know whether it is murder or suicide but non of us are have
anything to do with it.
------------------------
Basanti, Sridam and othes have given evidance to the correctness of my
stand point no. 2 and 3.
I am asking Bhima what details Adri has provided for the conspiracy by
Mayapur devotees. As there can't be any conspiracy without meeting of
the accused before the action.
If Adri can't provide this then he lied at least onone count and
therefore should offer his resignation as he made accusation witout any
substance whatsoever.
Hare Krsna.
Your servant, Dayaram Das (Text COM:3664319)
-----------------------------------------
|