|

28TH MARCH 2001
|
GBC Paralysis Documented In Resolutions |
1.
GBC Paralysis Documented In Resolutions
2.
Badri Misrepresents Ritvik
|
1.
GBC Paralysis Documented In Resolutions |
We reported in our last newsletter (please see
newsletter no.44: "GBC
Meetings End In Fiasco"), on how the GBC meetings this year achievednothing. Though one GBC has tried to spin his way out of this expose (please see next story), the truth is now there for everyone to read for themselvesin the 2001 GBC resolutions which have just been published. When we analysed last year's GBC resolutions (please see
newsletter no.18: "GBC ResolutionsContinue to Produce Laughter"), we were able to highlight how ludicrous they were. This year the GBC have not let us down, but rather have surpassedthemselves. For whilst last year the GBC passed a bunch of joke resolutions, this year they really had *NOTHING* to pass, since the meetings did notresolve anything of substance except that they should simply continue on with the same mess. However, to cover up this inaction they have managed topad out the rulings with meaningless and inconsequential resolutions, as we will now demonstrate. All GBC resolutions will be quoted in speech marks, thus " ".
We will begin first, though, with an annual old favourite, without which any year's GBC resolutions would not be complete; namely, the:
*’Annual Another One Bites the Dust’ Resolution *
Only this year there are at least 2!
| "10.THAT the GBC Body accepts the resignation of Rohini Suta dasa from the GBC Body, as explained in the following letter. The GBC Body also endorses his decision concerning his disciples. We thank him for his many years of loyal and effective service as a GBC member and wish him well in his ongoing services to Srila Prabhupada." |
The letter from Rohini Suta states:
| "Also, because of my discrepancy in marrying one of my own disciples, I will not be initiating any disciples or accepting aspiring disciples." |
We wonder, therefore, if this incestuous activity was what the GBC had in mind when they said:
| "The GBC thank Rohini Suta for his "many years of loyal and effective service as a GBC member". |
Rohini Suta also claims:
| "I also desire to write articles and books. [...] I will keep in contact with my disciples-helping and encouraging them as I am able, within my capacity in Krishna consciousness, and according to the teachings of Srila Prabhupada and our guru-parampara." |
We see that after being unable to follow a most simple and fundamental principle of the 'guru-parampara', that a Guru does not commit incest and marry his own disciple, his response is to write books and continue to instruct his disciples "according to the teachings of Srila Prabhupada and our guru-parampara"! And for this the GBC gives him a pat on the back and encourages him to remain as a Guru, instruct his disciples and "wish him well in his ongoing services to Srila Prabhupada."! Is it any wonder that no one has any faith left in the GBC, and are defecting to the Gaudiya Matha in their droves, where at least they seem to have the basic moral sense that one is not fit to continue as a Guru if they commit incest by marrying their own disciples? So even such basic morality the GBC are lacking:
"In New York there is a yogi. I do not wish to name his... But in
the paper it was published that he was having sex with his disciple.
Is it not? [...] Yes, everyone knows. What is this? (laughing) Even
from moral point of view, a disciple is just like daughter. And this
man was having sex life with his disciple. And he's a yogi. Just
see. Even he has no moral sense, apart from spiritual knowledge.
According to human social constitution, one should not have sex life
with daughter, with mother and sister. And what is this? If one has
sex life with daughter, then where is the moral life?"
(Srila Prabhupada Room Conversation, May 31st, 1974)
Thus a Guru who has committed incest is blessed by the GBC to not only continue in that incestuous relationship, but to also continue to act as a diksa Guru to his disciples. Thus not being content with having inserted paedophilia into the parampara, the GBC have decided to go further and insert incest as well! Also Suhotra Swami is, it is hoped, throwing in the towel on his adventure as a 'Guru':
| "11.THAT His Holiness Suhotra Swami
is granted his request for a two year leave of absence on grounds outlined in the following letter: [...] "I intend to spend a good deal of time in India to enhance my spiritual life. Also, I will not be making disciples or giving initiation during my leave of absence. In two years I will reassess in consultation with my Godbrothers my situation as spiritual master." |
Unfortunately the GBC see nothing at all incongruous in a 'Guru' needing to go away on a 'sabbatical' to 'enhance his spiritual life'. Isn't to 'enhance his spiritual life' supposed to be the reason why a *disciple* takes a Guru in the first place! And what's more, the GBC are happy to leave the door open for Suhotra to 'resume' in the parampara in a couple of years time, after he has stopped off for a 'tune-up' and re-charged his spiritual
batteries! As we said - is there any wonder why faith in the GBC is at rock bottom, and ISKCON is being decimated by mass defections to the Gaudiya Matha?
Now we come on to the space filling resolutions - passed simply to pad out the pages, and make everybody think that the GBC actually resolved something in Mayapura this year.
*’Let's Restate the Obvious’ Resolution*
Repeating various points which are already clearly delineated in Srila Prabhupada's books, is always a good way to fill up a few pages:
"103. [STATEMENT] Statement on ISKCON's Building
Vaisnava Community
ISKCON is a sankirtana movement oriented toward building
Vaisnava communities with different types of members: devotees
resident in asramas/temples (ideally brahminically inclined
and/or under training), home-based practicing devotees
(financially self-sufficient, regularly attending temple
functions, and actively practicing sadhana-bhakti), and
home-based well-wishers who may not practice sadhana-bhakti
regularly but support the temple financially or otherwise." |
You mean the world sankirtana movement is meant to encompass the world? Well I never!
"303. [STATEMENT] Definition of Illicit Sex Whereas:
- Many devotees have become confused as to what constitutes
illicit sex; - Srila Prabhupada has clearly stated that "purity
is the force" and that it comes from following the four
regulative principles strictly; and - It is important to
properly train new devotees according to Srila Prabhupada's
standards and to maintain their faith in the necessity of
adhering to those standards. [...] sex life according to
religious principles followed by Gaudiya Vaisnavas is for the
propagation of children, not for any other purpose, and that the
responsibility of the parents is then to make their offspring
Krishna conscious. As stated in the Fifth Canto of
Srimad-Bhagavatam, [...]". |
And so on for another couple of pages. While they were at it, maybe the GBC could also have told us what constitutes 'Intoxication'. I am sure that would have filled up at least another of couple of pages as well!
*’Never Do Today What You Can Put Off Till Tomorrow’ Resolution*
A famous GBC technique to camouflage inaction is to ask for 'research, reports and reviews' sometime in the distant future when everyone will have forgotten.
"301. [ACTION ORDER] Leadership Assessment and
Training Whereas there is a need for increased training and
assessment of leaders in the ISKCON society, including at the
GBC level.
Therefore it is resolved THAT: a subcommittee is hereby formed
consisting of Anuttama dasa (convener), Radhanatha Swami, Ramai
Swami, Ravindra Svarupa dasa, Sivarama Swami, and Svavasa dasa
to research and develop a process for ongoing, regular
assessment and training for GBC members. Emphasis will be on
character and competence with a view to developing the full
potential of individual leaders. This shall be executed in
consultation with the GBC Executive Officers and others. The
committee will strive to complete its recommendations and attain
GBC Body approval of the recommended processes prior to the
Mayapur 2002 meetings for initial implementation during the
meetings. If prior approval is not possible, the GBC will review
the assessment process during the 2002 Mayapur meetings for
implementation at Mayapur 2003." |
We see that the GBC are already putting this one off for at least 2 years!
*’We Forgot To Do It Last Year - Let's See If We Can Forget Again’ Resolution*
| "402. [ACTION ORDER] Disciples Initiating in the
Physical Presence of Their Guru Whereas GBC resolution No.
610/2000 requesting a definitive paper on the subject has not
been completed; Therefore it is resolved THAT: an expanded
subcommittee be formed to further research the question of a
disciples initiating in the physical presence of their guru,
presenting a detailed study encompassing various viewpoints." |
*’Another Resolution That Can Be Ignored’*
| "202. [GUIDELINE] Congregational Preaching Newsletter
THAT all ISKCON temples and yatras should report on a quarterly
basis their activities in relation to congregational preaching
in the Congregational Preaching Newsletter. [ACTION ORDER] The
Congregational Development Ministry shall be responsible to
establish the scoring system (assigning specific values for
specific preaching activities) and to publish the Congregational
Preaching Newsletter." |
We sincerely look forward to a burst of this congregational preaching activity over the coming year!
*’More Excuses To Talk Rather Than Act’ Resolution*
401. [ACTION ORDER] Therefore it is resolved THAT:
the GBC Executive Committee is directed to focus time during
2001 on strategic planning and analysis, thus assisting the
international GBC in developing its long-range goals and
priorities. Any specific proposals and recommendations should be
discussed and reviewed during the Mayapur 2002 meetings for
further refinement, approval, or disapproval. GBC Members
suggest the following preaching strategies for consideration:
- Training and education for children and adults. - A
comprehensive preaching plan for India based on development of
Mayapur. - Social issues like welfare for aged devotees,
hospices, gurukula, youth, etc. - Helping the GBC act more in a
leadership capacity and less as a managerial body. -
Helping the GBC improve teamwork, accountability, and integrity.
-
Developing Vedic culture in ISKCON rather than "Krishna-izing"
western culture. - Reviving book distribution, harinama, and
prasadam distribution at all temples. - Better communication of
the positive contributions of ISKCON and of the GBC. - Improving
the quality and training of gurus. -
Helping devotees make the transition from brahmacari/carini
asrama to grhastha life. - Developing more of an economic base
for ISKCON. - Bringing Vaisnavism to the religious and
philosophical forefront through academic initiatives." |
Most of these are all things which ISKCON should be DOING - and yet we are still at the drawing-board stage, as the GBC spend more time 'planning, analysing, proposing and refining', which will then be followed by grand sounding initiatives that will be left unimplemented, just like virtually
every other initiative that has been proposed by the GBC for the last 23
years. It is also interesting to note that the GBC officially commit themselves to 'improving the quality and training of Gurus'. Now we are admitting that our urus actually need training. Is it any wonder therefore that devotees are
leaving ISKCON to join organisations where they claim their Gurus are already fully trained!
*’Let's Create Yet Another Official Post’ Resolution *
"610. [GUIDELINE] Local Coordinator of Youth Programs
Whereas: - There is an increasing need for engaging our youth in
all aspects of our movement; -
There are more and more youth growing up and coming of age in
our movement;
- ISKCON Youth Ministry requires the help of local
representatives to effectively minister to and engage youth at
local levels.
Therefore it is resolved THAT: every temple, when possible,
should have a Coordinator of Youth Programs to reach out to and
engage the youth of the local congregation. This Coordinator of
Youth Programs shall coordinate his/her efforts with the Youth
Ministry." |
The history of ISKCON is littered with grand sounding ministries, committees and posts, which the GBC seem to believe will miraculously manifest just by the GBC announcing them in Mayapur!
*’We Lost The Case - Let's Remind Ourselves To Do Something’ Resolution*
"615. [ACTION ORDER] Show Cause Notice Whereas: - The
Executive Committee in conjunction with the local Zonal
Secretary sent a Show Cause Notice to Adridharan dasa on 13
September 2000; - Adridharan dasa filed a petition challenging
the same in the Calcutta High Court dated September
28,
2000; and - The Hon'ble Justice P.C. Ghosh of Calcutta High
Court by his order dated September 28, 2000 directed Adridharan
dasa to reply the Show Cause Notice and injuncted the GBC Body
from taking any further steps against Adridharan dasa till
disposal of the application. Therefore it is resolved THAT: the
GBC Body insists that the Executive Committee (EC) take
appropriate steps for an early hearing of the case relating to
Show Cause Notice regards removal of Adridharan dasa, temple
president (also known as "branch president") of the ISKCON
temple/branch situated at 3C, Albert Road, Calcutta, which is
now pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta.
There is no need of any further discussion regards the issue of
Show Cause as it has been done correctly by the Executive
Committee, in conformity with ISKCON Law." |
Please
note how the GBC admit the defeat they received at the hands of the IRM,
whereby they state that the Judge "injuncted the GBC Body from taking
any further steps against Adridharan dasa till disposal of the
application."
Which is another way of saying that their useless 'show cause notice'
was stopped in its tracks until the whole validity of the Ritvik issue
is decided. It is also interesting to note that the only thing which is
preventing the 'disposal of the application' is the GBC, who in their
usual spaced-out mode have yet to reply to our official affadavit in
response.
They issued the show cause in September 2000, and 6 months later still
nothing has happened.
*’Reward Donors By Creating Another Meaningless Post’ Resolution*
"104. [STATEMENT] Appreciation On behalf of our
beloved Founder-acarya His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami
Prabhupada, we of ISKCON's Governing Body Commission Society
extend our grateful appreciation to Sriman Srinathji Prabhu,
Sriman Radha Giridhari Prabhu, and Sriman Kesava Prabhu. These
three devotees of the ISKCON Chowpatty temple, with
encouragement from their diksa-guru Radhanatha Swami, gave this
year a very generous donation to help the ISKCON GBC Society in
its service to ISKCON.
405. [ACTION ORDER] GBC Secretariat Office in Mumbai Whereas
there is a need to increase the administrative support systems
of the International GBC.
Therefore it is resolved THAT: Radha Krishna dasa shall
establish an office for the GBC Secretariat in Chowpatty in
Mumbai. He shall serve the Secretariat by providing his
part-time services under the direction of the GBC Executive
Committee. He is also hereby authorized to hire office staff as
necessary with a first-year allotted budget of US$6,000." |
ISKCON Chowpatty gives money to
the GBC, large enough to get an official mention in the GBC resolutions.
ISKCON Chowpatty is then chosen to set up an official GBC office.
*’Let's Invent Yet Another System That Srila Prabhupada Never Sanctioned’ Resolution*
"609. [ACTION ORDER] Brahminical Advisory Council
Whereas: - The GBC could benefit from the support and advice of
devotees who are particularly knowledgeable in scripture; - The
GBC decision-making process and resolutions could be reinforced
by more comprehensive sastric evidence.
Therefore it is resolved THAT: permanent, pro-active body of
trusted, brahminical devotees without managerial commitments be
formed to research philosophical issues for the purpose of
advising the GBC and giving them feedback. This Brahminical
Advisory Council (BAC) would be an advisory body only,
subordinate to the GBC. Its conclusions and advice would be in
no way binding on the GBC." |
Srila Prabhupada set up the GBC to be the topmost brahmins in the ISKCON Society, who would guide the Society based on Srila Prabhupada's teachings. Now we are told we actually need a proper group of brahmins to advise the GBC. Further, that they are required since the GBC need help from those who are 'knowledgeable in scripture'. Pardon me for stating the obvious, but isn't that what the whole Society thought the GBC was supposed to be? In which case, why not just make the Brahminical council the GBC! Srila Prabhupada never created a separate body of Brahmins to advise the GBC; the GBC were
SUPPOSED to be these brahmins:
"The
GBC must be vigilant by following the regulative principles and
teach by ideal character the presidents of the centers, and the
presidents by their ideal character must teach the others then
automatically all members of the whole institution will be ideal to
the human society. Then we can dictate to administrators or
sometimes take hold of the administration. In the absence of
competent leaders we may take the post. But we must be very careful
in the flow of the political movement we may not forget our ideal
life. For example, Parasaram was a Brahmin but when he found the
ksatriyas were mismanaging he killed them twenty one times and some
of them fled to European countries. This is the history. So far we
are concerned we shall keep ourselves in ideal brahminical position
and if need be if no ksatriya or Vaisya is here we can take up their
work as emergency. Our business is to create ideal ksatriyas and
vaisyas but beyond that our real business is to keep ourselves as
ideal Brahmins. If we are not ideal we cannot create others as
ideal. [...] So our business is to keep fit as brahmanas and to
train others to be ideal ksatriyas and vaisyas for advancing the
whole society."
(Srila Prabhupada Letter To Rupanuga, 28/4/74)
Srila Prabhupada speaks of how actually the whole Society is supposed to composed of ideal brahmanas, with the GBC taking the LEAD in this by teaching the Society to become such brahmins. He never spoke of another class of brahmins who were supposed to teach the GBC.
*’Opportunity For More Contemplation Of The Collective Navel’ Resolution*
2 403. [RULE OF ORDER] Preaching Vision Council
Whereas: - Srila Prabhupada said the GBC annual meetings should
produce preaching strategies; - The GBC meeting is an ideal time
to brainstorm ideas for global preaching; - Often the GBC does
not allocate sufficient time to produce preaching strategies
during their meetings; - There is a need to provide preaching
vision to the society to enliven the GBC and the entire society,
and to inspire preaching and development of Krishna
consciousness.
Therefore it is resolved THAT: as part of the agenda of every
annual GBC meeting, there shall be a Preaching Vision Council
that shall plan strategies, define standards, and improve the
quality of all ISKCON preaching.
Among the duties of the Council shall be: 1) Devising systems
to encourage/develop the devotees' skills/abilities/proclivities
through training and education, 2) Finding ways for the GBC and
other leaders to facilitate preaching, 3) Discussing ways to
increase the number of festivals, 4) Initiating or planning
global events (like Srila Prabhupada's Centennial)." |
So after 23 years the GBC have realised that the annual GBC meetings were supposed to develop preaching strategies! So now we are to have a 'preaching vision council'. Obviously this is where we have been going wrong all these years. I am sure that now we have these 'preaching vision councils' we can look forward to a huge explosion in preaching to flow forth!
*’More Attempts To Court the Gaudiya Matha’ Resolution*
"607. [ACTION ORDER] Bhakti Gaurava Narasimha Swami
Whereas: - Several ISKCON leaders have had discussions with
Bhakti Gaurava Narasimha Swami (Jagat Guru Swami); - ISKCON is
open to dialogue with Narasimha Swami; -
Narasimha Swami feels that there were inappropriate actions
directed against him by some ISKCON members in the past; - Some
ISKCON members feel that Narasimha Swami has performed some
inappropriate actions against ISKCON.
Therefore it is resolved THAT:
1. A committee be formed to open a formal dialogue with Bhakti
Gaurava Narasimha Swami, including at least one face-to-face
meeting.
2. The committee should initially consist of: Bir Krishna dasa
Goswami, Guru Prasad Swami, and Vaidyanatha dasa, and they may
co-opt additional members as required.
3. The committee should conclude its assignment and present a
report at the Annual GBC Meeting in February 2002." |
We
have already noted how the GBC have borrowed many of their bogus 'living
guru' philosophies wholesale from the Gaudiya Matha; how they took
certificates from all the Gaudiya Mathas as official evidence in the
Ritvik court case initiated by the IRM; how leading GBC members openly
glorify the deviant sahajiya teachings of Tripurari Swami, who has
written a new Bhagavad-Gita since he feels Srila Prabhupada's edition
requires "modernizing"; who had stated that the greatest problem with
ISKCON is its 'over-emphasis on Srila Prabhupada'; whose newsletters are
officially published on the ISKCON COM conferencing system. Now we see
they wish to cosy up to Narasimha Swami, who left ISKCON to join
Sridhara Maharaja's camp.
The above represents a large chunk of the resolutions passed. As is
clear, the GBC really did not resolve anything. Indeed the only
substantive resolutions they passed were those reporting on the latest
Gurus to have strayed from the path. It seems that after 23 years the
GBC are not even capable of passing the usual ridiculous resolutions.
Now they just seem to resolve to do nothing at all.
|
2.
Badri
Misrepresents Ritvik |
Following our accurate report in the last newsletter (number 44: "GBCMeetings End in Fiasco") of how the GBC resolutions ended up achieving nothing, the faithful GBC apologist Badrinarayan has been forced by our damning expose to try and issue a weak rebuttal. He attempts to spin-doctor
that the meetings actually presented a 'positive
alternative' to the calls for GBC reform. Well, we have just analysed
most of them, and devotees can make their own minds up as to how
'positive' they were. But in order to assess Badri's 'report' of the
meetings, one does not need to go any further than read the blatant
misrepresentation he gives of the 'ritvik idea' with which he tries
unsuccessfully to compare the attempts at GBC restructuring which were
proposed at the meetings.
He states:
| "As for why the GBC decided as it did,
there are several reasons. One was the opinion that this
proposal attempted to do to the GBC system what the ritvic idea
would do to the guru system. The ritvic idea is based on the
premise that we are all inherently and perpetually flawed." |
WRONG! The Ritvik idea does NOT
have this as its premise, as anyone who has studied our position knows
full well. Its premise is simply that we need to follow the orders of
Srila Prabhupada, rather than follow some notion of 'tradition' which we
have learned from the Gaudiya Matha.
| "It assumes that no one is or ever will
become qualified as a genuine guru..." |
WRONG AGAIN! It simply states that we can
all be genuine gurus if we teach what Srila Prabhupada has taught. But,
we have not been authorised to take disciples.
| "...and that we therefore need a
system to provide for guruship without personal qualification: a
spiritual system minus spiritual qualification, if you will." |
How can a system that has as its basis the fact
that there are NO other Diksa Gurus other than Srila Prabhupada,
be proposing "a system to provide for guruship"? We propose that we only
need one qualified Diksa Guru - Srila Prabhupada - and he states that we
are saying the opposite, that we want a whole system of Gurus who are
not qualified! Rather, it is HE who proposes this - that the one
qualified Diksa Guru, Srila Prabhupada - be replaced by a system of
guruship that does not require qualification; it simply requires that
the necessary votes of endorsement are received at the annual GBC
meetings.
| "Ritvicism is based on a negative and
builds a system from there." |
WRONG FOR THE 4TH TIME!! "Ritvikism"
builds from the POSITIVE - the flawless Guru Srila Prabhupada -
and builds a system from there, as ordered by His Divine Grace Srila
Prabhupada on July 9th 1977. Badri's system starts from the negative -
the idea that Srila Prabhupada is now 'dead' and unable to give diksa -
and builds from there a bogus, unauthorized system of guruship based on
no spiritual qualification: a material system minus spiritual
qualification, if you like.
It is amazing how Badri blatantly states that the Ritvik position is
actually the exact OPPOSITE of what it really is. Badri has been
on the previous Ritvik sub-committee, and so he should know what the
Ritvik position actually is. So either he is unable to understand
English, or pretends to deal with an issue he knows nothing about, or is
just an outright liar. We will let you decide which. But he definitely
does not have a clue what he is talking about.
Amazingly he ends with a statement which epitomises the hypocrisy
which oozes from our GBC:
| "But I would offer that listening only
to the voices heard on these conferences or in meetings held
only with like-minded individuals will give one a limited and
slanted sampling of the opinions in ISKCON." |
This from the representative of a group that does
NOTHING but ONLY meets with 'like-minded individuals' and
disciples, and very rarely wanders forth into the realms of grass-roots
ISKCON.
Thank you for taking the time
to read this newsletter, and please keep your letters, and e-mail
addresses of other devotees who should be added to our list, flowing in.
A hard copy of our main position
paper
'The Final Order' is
available on request.
If you would like to
receive any of the back issues of the Newsletter please let me know.
No 1.
Invitation to Srila Prabhupada's Vyasa Puja
No 2.
GBC Lose First Round of Court Case
No 3.
The Story VNN Refused to Publish
No 4.
Poison Theorists Accuse Adri of Complicity
No 5.
Iskcon Continues to Promote Child Abusers
No 6.
Invitation to Malaysia
No 7.
United World Body Formed
No 8.
Does Srila Prabhupada Support Poisoning Theory?
No 9.
PADA Attacks IRM Position
No 10.
PADA Continues to Present False Evidence
No 11.
GBC Funded Video says Ritvik Spiritual
No 12.
Child Rapist Selected by Gurus to Defend their Legitimacy
No 13.
GBC Facing Perjury Charge in Calcutta High Court
No 14.
Sahajiyaism Makes a Comeback in Iskcon.
No 15.
Govt. Minister Inaugurates Bangalore Rathayatra
No 16.
Iskcon Calcutta Triumphs Following Arson Attack
No 17.
Fighting Lies with Truth Not More Lies
No 18.
GBC Resolutions Continue to Provide Laughter
No 19.
Indian Leaders Endorse IRM Position That GBC Confused
No 20.
Convicted Child Abuser Officially 'Returns' To Parampara
No 21.
GBC Chairman Admits ISKCON 'Disintegrating'
No 22.
Krishna Confirms ISKCON Re-Birth
No 23.
Hare Krishna Explosion Begins In New York as IRM Temple Opens
No 24.
IRM Launches Media Campaign to Defend Srila Prabhupada
No 25.
GBC Teaches That 'Living Gurus' NOT Required
No 26.
BBT Admits Books Changed To Fit GBC Philosophy
No 27.
Big Breakthrough For Krishna In Singapore
No 28.
Bangalore Tops World Book Distribution
No 29.
City of New York to Honour Srila Prabhupada
No 30.
Gurukula Lawsuit Special - The Facts
No 31.
BBC Glorifies Srila Prabhupada to the World
No 32.
Harinama Revived in World Famous Times Square
No 33.
ISKCON Guru on Run From Police - Suicide Case Special
No 34.
GBC Declare All Out War
No 35.
GBC Fail Again in Second Expulsion Attempt
No 36.
Indian Press Glorifies New York IRM
No 37.
ISKCON Temple In Bangladesh Joins IRM
No 38.
All Ports Alert For Jayapataka To Be Issued
No 39.
The GBC's Best Trick Yet
No 40.
Biggest Prasadam Distribution Program Ever Begins
No 41.
Double Edition - IRM Granted Prime Kumbha Mela Site
No 42.
Danavir Invents A New Philosophy
No 43.
IRM Makes World Headlines
No 44.
GBC Meetings End in Fiasco |